Kinnison ML, Powe NR, Steinberg EP: Benefits for randomized governed samples with low- vs . high-osmolality differentiation media.Radiology 170:381–389, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
Powe NR, Kinnison ML, Steinberg EP: Good analysis connected with randomized managed assessments about compare media.Radiology 170:377–380, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
Evens RG, McClennan BL (eds): Cheap osmolality comparison media: pick as well as test to get the particular 80’s.Diagn Image resolution [Suppl] 9:12, 1987Google Scholar
Katzberg RW: Vary media: evaluation connected with ionic in addition to nonionic substances.
ARRS Categorical Course—Uroradiology. Different Social class, Louisiana, Could, 1989Google Scholar
Bettmann d McClennan BL (eds): Initially International Ioversol Symposium: a fabulous surgical summary.Invest Radiol [Suppl] 1989Google Scholar
McClennan BL: Low osmolality vary low to medium — premises and even promises.Radiology 162:1–8, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
Gertz EW: Thromboembolic occurrences and nonionic contrast.Diagn Image resolution X: 106–109, 1989Google Scholar
Ing JJ, Smith DC, Half truths BS: Vary type of accessories associated with clotting inhibition by ionic plus nonionic variety agents.Radiology 172:345–348, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
Almén T: Old summary in comparison press development.
World from Uroradiology Syllabus.
Southwest florida, New york, September, 1989Google Scholar
Guidelines designed for employ about brand new minimal osmolar comparison medium.ACR Bulletin, November 1988Google Scholar
Bettmann Mum, Geller Ersus, McClennan BL, Dunnick NR: Existing implement connected with very low osmolality vary agents: final results about a new survey.AJR 1989 (in press)Google Scholar
Lasser EC, Fruit CC: Nonionic as opposed to ionic vary media: what precisely accomplish the data show us?AJR 152:945–946, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
Jacobson PD, Rosenquist CJ: The actual rewards with low-osmolar set off products inside radiology.
Medical, ixaxaar book review, appropriate and court policy issues.JAMA 260:1586–1592, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katayama H: Article from typically the Nippon Panel concerning Basic safety associated with Set off Advertising.
Given for this Radiological Community associated with North The states Gathering, Don't forget national, 1988Google Scholar
Palmer FJ: This RACR questionnaire of intravenous set off media channels reactions ultimate report.Australas Radiol 32:426–428, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf GL, Arenson RL, Get across AP: A good potential demo in ionic or nonionic vary real estate agents through plan investigation and rehearse.
Evaluation with damaging effects.AJR 152:939–944, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
Higashi Vertisements, Takizawa k Suzuki s et al.: Future examine associated with damaging reply towards 4 employed distinction media—comparison with low-osmolality plus high-osmolality distinction media.Nippon Acta Radiol 48:1364–1370, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hruby n Stellamor K: Rather long duration consequences by using the nonionic distinction medium—a surgical go through report.Rontgenblatter 40:73–77, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
Moore RD, Steinberg EP, Powe NR, et al.: Rate as well as determinants associated with unwanted allergic reactions induced just by high-osmolality difference media.Radiology 170:727–732, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
Steinberg EP, Anderson GF, Powe NR, et al.: Employ involving low-osmolality contrast advertising around your price-sensitive environment.AJR 151:271–274, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar